Open hhchen1105 opened 7 years ago
I tried running your code. Didn't know where you imported mean_squared_error
from, so instead I used
rmse = math.sqrt(((data.Y - y_pred)**2).mean())
In 3 runs, I got the following results: 0.8136, 0.8122, 0.8135
Which is still not as good as reported, but better than your results. Not sure why that is.
I tried running the same code on another machine and got a much better result (0.8133), but in the original machine, I still got 0.91xx. :(
A related issue: on the new machine, I separated the data into 80% training and 20% testing. Based on the same parameter, the test RMSE is 0.9502, much worse than the training RMSE 0.7727. It is probably better to emphasize on the benchmarks the RMSEs are in fact "training" RMSE.
I tried to reproduce the RMSEs of ml-100k reported in the benchmarks. However, the number I got is 0.91474, far worse than the reported score 0.810 (I even used the training rmse). May I ask how to get the benchmark numbers? Here is my code:
Thanks.