What working group (or team) did this request originate from?
Aragorn KP (Max Wang)
Solution we'd like
Biolink Model subject--predicate->object ("S-P-O") statements of the form biolink:Gene -- biolink:affects -> biolink:ChemicalEntity may not directly match any available subclass of biolink:Association. That said, it may be feasible to match an 'inverse' S-P-O pattern to a specific subclass of biolink:Association. That is, to transform the above pattern into a meaningful inverse on - for the above example, the pattern biolink:ChemicalEntity -- biolink:affected_by -> biolink:Gene - then reattempt the match.
Motivating issue is briefly documented in https://github.com/NCATSTranslator/reasoner-validator/issues/93. See also the related Biolink Model issue.
What working group (or team) did this request originate from?
Aragorn KP (Max Wang)
Solution we'd like
Biolink Model subject--predicate->object ("S-P-O") statements of the form biolink:Gene -- biolink:affects -> biolink:ChemicalEntity may not directly match any available subclass of
biolink:Association
. That said, it may be feasible to match an 'inverse' S-P-O pattern to a specific subclass ofbiolink:Association
. That is, to transform the above pattern into a meaningful inverse on - for the above example, the pattern biolink:ChemicalEntity -- biolink:affected_by -> biolink:Gene - then reattempt the match.Tag relevant members for discussion @sierra-moxon