biolink / biolink-model

Schema and generated objects for biolink data model and upper ontology
https://biolink.github.io/biolink-model/
Other
176 stars 72 forks source link

need a biolink-model term for mouse strain #236

Closed justaddcoffee closed 3 years ago

justaddcoffee commented 5 years ago

I'm looking for a biolink model term to represent mouse strain (C57black, BALB/c). This doesn't seem to exist now in biolink-model. I'm guessing this same term might be used to describe subspecies in other species besides mouse - human subpopulations, yeast strains, etc. Could we make a term for this, or could someone point me to the most appropriate term?

justaddcoffee commented 5 years ago

@deepakunni3 per our convo, there is the term "population of individual organisms", which might be the right one here...

cmungall commented 5 years ago

There is an argument for including a subclass for strain/breed https://www.ebi.ac.uk/ols/ontologies/geno/terms?iri=http%3A%2F%2Fpurl.obolibrary.org%2Fobo%2FGENO_0000112

TomConlin commented 5 years ago

more fodder

#
#           biospecimen         https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biological_specimen
#       specimen            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zoological_specimen
#       organism            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Organism
#   strain              https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strain_(biology)
#   breed               https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Breed
#   cultivar            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cultivar
#   hybrid              https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hybrid_(biology)
#   landrace            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Landrace

forma               https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Form_(botany)
varietas            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Variety_(botany)
subspecies          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subspecies
deepakunni3 commented 4 years ago

There is an argument for including a subclass for strain/breed https://www.ebi.ac.uk/ols/ontologies/geno/terms?iri=http%3A%2F%2Fpurl.obolibrary.org%2Fobo%2FGENO_0000112

@cmungall Do we want to add a subclass for strain/breed?

deepakunni3 commented 4 years ago

We could treat strain as an organism taxon for an organism class. What about breed, cultivar, landrace, etc.? These ought to be addressed by reusing organism taxon

RichardBruskiewich commented 4 years ago

In crop science (plants), there are global standards which tag different kinds of subpopulations, eg. landraces, cultivar, etc. See http://aims.fao.org/vest-registry/metadata-sets/faoipgri-multi-crop-passport-descriptors

TomConlin commented 4 years ago

others

#           biospecimen         https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biological_specimen
#       specimen            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zoological_specimen
#       organism            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Organism
#   strain              https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strain_(biology)
#   breed               https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Breed
#   cultivar            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cultivar
#   hybrid              https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hybrid_(biology)
#   landrace            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Landrace

forma               https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Form_(botany)
varietas            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Variety_(botany)
RichardBruskiewich commented 4 years ago

Once again, in the world of (crop) plants, the various terms - landrace, hybrid, cultivar, etc. - have less to do with the biology of the plant than it has to do with their sociological, geographical or technical origin. There are, of course, typical genetic features of interest in each of these plants even if they are the same species. In many crop plants, for example, rice, there are major ancient subtypes - Oryza sativa japonica, Oryza sativa indica, etc. - as well as many subpopulations specific to environments and regions. All of these categories could, in principle, be tagged as "Strains" although the term is not commonly used in (crop) plant science.

I suspect that if we simple introduce the Biolink model subclass "Strain" to designate a genetically distinct instance of a species (taxon), then we will adequately cover alot of ground. Beyond that, all the rest is what we call "germplasm documentation".

nlharris commented 3 years ago

Should this still be assigned to @mbrush?

sierra-moxon commented 3 years ago

The Alliance probably has some work we can reuse here. In particular, the concepts of genotypes, strains, backgrounds and genotypes with sequence targeting reagents should be "groupable" into a higher level class.

sierra-moxon commented 3 years ago

the model has:

  population of individual organisms:
    description: >-
      A collection of individuals from the same taxonomic class
      distinguished by one or more characteristics.  Characteristics can
      include, but are not limited to, shared geographic location, genetics,
      phenotypes [Alliance for Genome Resources]
    local_names:
      ga4gh: population
      agr: population
    mixins:
      - thing with taxon
    is_a: organismal entity
    exact_mappings:
      - PCO:0000001
      - SIO:001061
      # UMLS Semantic Type "Population Group"
      - STY:T098
      - OBI:0000181
    id_prefixes:
      - HANCESTRO
    in_subset:
      - model_organism_database