search

biometricITC / cPP-biometrics

Contains the development of a Collaborative Protection Profile for biometrics
MIT License
10 stars 2 forks source link

Point to quality paper vs ask vendor #339

Closed woodbe closed 3 years ago

woodbe commented 3 years ago

https://github.com/biometricITC/cPP-biometrics/blame/b9a70e87cfe401d0beb66a60ab01884e999a2676/Supporting%20Documents/BS_SD.adoc#L520

I am thinking that maybe this should point to a quality paper instead of telling the evaluator to ask the vendor about creating low quality samples. The point of adding the paper was to provide guidance about quality, so it would seem that based on that the evaluator should be able to try. I don't have an issue stating that if you can't, then ask, but I would expect that based on the documentation about samples the evaluator should be able to do this.

n-kai commented 3 years ago

@woodbe My concern is that such quality papers or standards may not exist for some quality scoring algorithm that the TOE implements. So I might add additional text to your PR.