biometricITC / cPP-biometrics

Contains the development of a Collaborative Protection Profile for biometrics
MIT License
10 stars 2 forks source link

NIST 800-63B Draft 4 comments #401

Closed woodbe closed 1 year ago

woodbe commented 1 year ago

Place to record draft comments

Comments that everyone agrees with will be submitted as from the iTC. Others should be submitted individually.

woodbe commented 1 year ago

PAD testing program comment

woodbe commented 1 year ago

Are mobile devices considered multi-factor when used as a biometric and something you have?

woodbe commented 1 year ago

Timeout period of forced 30 seconds after initial limit has been reached

woodbe commented 1 year ago

50 attempts without PAD seems very high if the system is on the low-end of acceptable FMR, even with it being part of MFA

woodbe commented 1 year ago

What are the expectations for proof on PAD (beyond the 90% success at detection)? Self-attest or validated?

woodbe commented 1 year ago

How is the relation between no-PAD and PAD (the 1:2 relation) determined? Is this the correct ratio?

woodbe commented 1 year ago

sp800-63-4-suite-ipd-comment-BIO-iTC.xlsx

Initial version of the comment sheet.

woodbe commented 1 year ago

sp800-63-4-suite-ipd-comment-BIO-iTC-0222.xlsx

I have updated the comments based on the latest update from @n-kai. Please take a look.

gfiumara commented 1 year ago

I don't have any issue putting forward Comments 1-8.

Comment 7

Comment 9

woodbe commented 1 year ago

sp800-63-4-suite-ipd-comment-BIO-iTC-0303.xlsx

I have made the changes as suggested by @gfiumara in this version of the document.

gregott commented 1 year ago

The comments look ok to me.

We can add that in 63A lines 943 and 948 are duplicates. This is in section 5.1.8., page 22.

woodbe commented 1 year ago

sp800-63-4-suite-ipd-comment-BIO-iTC-0307.xlsx

Updated with @gregott comment

woodbe commented 1 year ago

Comments sent