Closed n-kai closed 4 years ago
I think the following attack names/numbers should be changed:
3D-face_attack_3 -> 3D-face_attack_2_1 2D-face_attack_1_2 -> 2D-face_attack_2_1 2D-face_attack_1_3 -> 2D-face_attack_3_1
My logic here is that the first number is the "class" of attacks, and then the second one is the sequence (if there are multiple). So for the 2D, the first class is printed image, the second is digital image, the third is video. So this would be the three categories, and there is one test in each. For the 3D, the 3D mask/head is obviously a second class, hence the 2_1.
@woodbe I agree with changing attack names/numbers as you suggested. It's much better than my numbering. I am also OK to change the layout according to #35.
OK, I will make the change to the numbering/structure when we move the content to the face repository (as opposed to doing it here).
3D face toolbox was created based on 2D toolbox