Closed bionicbone closed 8 months ago
This has been implimented Once the loop of codes has been used change the numbers by a predetermined init-value to all numbers in rollingCode[], thus the codes would never cycle, and when the init-value is added there will be no way to reverse engineer the init-value from the previous last value in the loop to the next first number in the loop, unless you had recorded the first number and somehow worked out the loop was about to renew.
Currently rollingCode[] is consumed in blocks of sizeofSendingRollingCode, when it reaches the end everything resets and we start again at the begining of rollingCode[]
Two thoughts,
Also Consider: Sending the same code over and over again would be ignored by the code !!