Open dshorthouse opened 5 years ago
There are other possibilities for better engagement for groups of people such as
@kcopas Interesting. I wonder how to leverage lists like this. Far better for the context to be established in wikipedia/wikidata, but it would be nice if these could be automatically drawn-in as a thematic group and w/ a group-wide progress indicator.
How about simply using the human members of a given group, e.g.
Interesting thread.
recordedByID
identifiers for groups of people in the sense discussed here? (so using this kind of wikidata identifiers, as cited here)@abubelinha
The intent was more like the first one in your list, though limited in the first pass as a list of participants in a group (defined I suppose with an optional start and end date) rather than dipping down to the particular specimens gathered throughout the course of one's membership in a group. What was later revealed however is the possibility for multiple start/end dates per participant in the same group. For example, a member of a long-running expedition may have multiple, documented affiliation/association points recorded as start/end and so development of this stalled.
Half-baked idea, but perhaps it would be useful for users to create groups (+ custom theme banner) and to solicit membership. There are many such taxonomically- and/or geographically-themed associations but few would ever have an opportunity to aggregate all their specimens as a showcase of their group's collective effort. In effect, this would be comparable to iNaturalist but for preserved specimens already shared to GBIF.