Closed matentzn closed 2 years ago
Same with dcterms: Should be:
dcterms: http://purl.org/dc/terms/
in bioregistry:
dcterms: https://dublincore.org/specifications/dublin-core/dcmi-terms/#
I have no knowledge nor opinion on this. Will accept any reasonable recommendations
From DCMI:
While the /elements/1.1/ namespace will be supported indefinitely, DCMI gently encourages use of the /terms/ namespace.
I would suggest to map
dc: http://purl.org/dc/terms/
base on the "gentle encouragement" of the DCMI itself (and my mission to rid the world of references to the elements namespace).
Does this mean we should consider DC and DCTERMS as the same prefix? Like should we merge these?
hm... I dont know what that means exactly, in my opinion they are the same, but they should be allowed to co-exist in large, non-harmonised projects.. Not sure. I think I prefer both of these to appear in my context? Not sure though.
needs a new issue for discussion, it won't block merging these other updates (I think?)
Yeah, I think so too.
I am generally using
dce
for elements, anddcterms
for terms, but its not clear to me how to decide whether the one or the other is preferable fordc
Bioregistry suggests element. DC itself tries to promote terms.. Whats you stance on that @cthoyt?