search

biopragmatics / bioversions

🪝 What's the latest version for each database?
https://biopragmatics.github.io/bioversions
MIT License
26 stars 7 forks source link

Added Bioschemas annotation #11

Closed egonw closed 3 years ago

egonw commented 3 years ago

From the Bioschemas website: 

Bioschemas aims to improve the Findability on the Web of life sciences resources such as datasets,
software, and training materials.

This can be on the original website itself (like on WikiPathways), but also on website that index it or have further information about it. The further information here, for example, is the link to the BioRegistry. The JSON-LD annotation will make it easier for other tools to recognize the content of the table. This includes the Google Dataset finder, besides Bioschemas itself.

cthoyt commented 3 years ago

Thanks, @egonw! Do you think you could update the PR description with a few sentences describing what having the bioschemas annotations accomplishes? I would also like to include that on the website/readme

egonw commented 3 years ago

@cthoyt, done. cc @AlasdairGray

cthoyt commented 3 years ago

I've made a few updates and added a slightly edited version of the description text. I'll give @AlasdairGray some time to comment until the end tomorrow, and merge if he doesn't have any suggestions for improvement.

AlasdairGray commented 3 years ago

What specifically are you wanting me to review?

cthoyt commented 3 years ago

What specifically are you wanting me to review?

🤷 I guess it's just good to keep you in the loop @AlasdairGray ! Is there anything else you think would be useful to write in the header about Bioschemas and Bioversions?

AlasdairGray commented 3 years ago

Can you point me to a webpage or a file to have a look at?

cthoyt commented 3 years ago

If you click the "files changed" tab at the top of this PR page, you can see the 2 changes in this PR: the short text describing Bioschemas and then the actual implementation of the json-ld embedding

cthoyt commented 3 years ago

@AlasdairGray really appreciate the feedback! I will make a new issue with some follow-up work that needs to be done to conform to parts of this.