search

biopsichas / cliwf

Climate workflow
1 stars 0 forks source link

Any advice on memory usage restrictions / Linux? #3

Closed moritzshore closed 8 months ago

moritzshore commented 8 months ago

Having a lot of problems with our virtural machine crashing due to unrestricted use of memory by the multi-core stuff.

From what I've read, this works much better on Linux with fork()'ing. Any experiences with this workflow on linux before I dive in?

Or experiences with memory restriction on windows?

I'll try to figure it out on my own for now, but if anyone has advice, i'm all ears!

@michstrauch ?

moritzshore commented 8 months ago

@michstrauch not sure if tagging works here but i'll try it out

michstrauch commented 8 months ago

Hi Mo,
I am in a rush, but for now: Wait before you dive into Linux forking. It won't work without a SWAT executable compiled for Linux.
Is there any chance in the climate workflow to restrict the number of threads to be you used? I did not yet run it myself ...

Cheers

moritzshore commented 8 months ago

Ok thanks, no rush micha! I'll stick with the windows stuff for now and see what I can do.

Sidenote: in our print.prt basin_wb is actually on line 11 not 10. Not sure if this is just a quirk in our setup, a quick in your setup, or just a typo. nevertheless, letting you know just in case.

image

Best!

ps. @NataljaC is the linux version of Rev_61_0_64rel already available somewhere?

NataljaC commented 8 months ago

We have successfully compiled the Linux exe, but we need to wait for all the collaborators to approve the changed that are made in the code. ETA ~ week.

Hope this is okay with you.

Natalja

biopsichas commented 8 months ago

Ok thanks, no rush micha! I'll stick with the windows stuff for now and see what I can do.

Sidenote: in our print.prt basin_wb is actually on line 11 not 10. Not sure if this is just a quirk in our setup, a quick in your setup, or just a typo. nevertheless, letting you know just in case.

image

Best!

ps. @NataljaC is the linux version of Rev_61_0_64rel already available somewhere?

Thank Moritz, print thing was my error. Now updated.