Closed jocelynpender closed 6 years ago
Coarse grained XML treatments correctly parse basionyms and synonyms as follows, for Cirsium arvense,
<taxon_identification status="BASIONYM"> <taxon_name rank="genus" authority="unknown" date="unknown">Serratula</taxon_name> <taxon_name rank="species" authority="Linnaeus" date="unknown">arvensis</taxon_name> <place_of_publication> <publication_title>Sp. Pl.</publication_title> <place_in_publication>2: 820. 1753</place_in_publication> </place_of_publication> <taxon_hierarchy>genus Serratula;species arvensis;</taxon_hierarchy> </taxon_identification> <taxon_identification status="SYNONYM"> <taxon_name rank="genus" authority="unknown" date="unknown">Breea</taxon_name> <taxon_name rank="species" authority="(Linnaeus) Lessing" date="unknown">arvensis</taxon_name> <taxon_hierarchy>genus Breea;species arvensis;</taxon_hierarchy> </taxon_identification>
etc. After parsing with Charaparser to obtain fine-grained parsed treatments, the taxon identification tags only show ACCEPTED names, with basionyms and synonyms nowhere to be found.
Coarse grained XML treatments correctly parse basionyms and synonyms as follows, for Cirsium arvense,
etc. After parsing with Charaparser to obtain fine-grained parsed treatments, the taxon identification tags only show ACCEPTED names, with basionyms and synonyms nowhere to be found.