search

biosemantics / etc-site-archived-do-not-use

Source code for the ETC Toolkit web application
http://etc.cs.umb.edu/etcsite/
1 stars 0 forks source link

[Ontology Building]The number of subclasses is not right in the tree visualization #587

Closed CathyYujie closed 7 years ago

CathyYujie commented 8 years ago

image

For example, the coloration has 16 subclasses in Categories, but there is just 3 in Tree Visualization. Maybe just appears the subclasses who has subclasses.

rodenhausen commented 8 years ago

This is the normal behavior as we have discussed it so far in regards to the requirements of this project.

For the filter on the grid: All rows are shown where any of the terms in that row contains the filter. For the filter on the tree: All nodes are shown where any of the nodes contains the filter + All their parents until the root is reached + All their children recursively.

How would you like it to be?

On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 4:32 PM, CathyYujie notifications@github.com wrote:

[image: image] https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/22200814/18652288/046e5168-7e86-11e6-9219-dd1721048cc3.png

For example, the coloration has 16 subclasses in Categories, but there is just 3 in Tree Visualization. Maybe just appears the subclasses who has subclasses.

— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/biosemantics/etc-site/issues/587, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADwzBXfktKWYXmtbAtjkyADL8VdCfGMOks5qrxtygaJpZM4KBEz5 .

rodenhausen commented 8 years ago

You can't necessarily view tree and grid as being synchronized in what data they show. The simple example is where you have two different filters on each of them.

It could still be desirable to have them show the same data when the same filter is applied, however as I said, it so far was not stated as a requirement. Is that what you would be looking for to have? If so, which would you prefer. The data shown in the grid, or the one in the tree. Or some completely other variant?

CathyYujie commented 8 years ago

I am sorry. We get a wrong understanding about our operations.

The function is right. You can just close this issue.