Closed carrascomj closed 3 years ago
Merging #273 (5c0447f) into devel (879e756) will decrease coverage by
0.80%
. The diff coverage is37.50%
.:exclamation: Current head 5c0447f differs from pull request most recent head 459ce3c. Consider uploading reports for the commit 459ce3c to get more accurate results
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## devel #273 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 64.41% 63.60% -0.81%
==========================================
Files 58 58
Lines 5572 5479 -93
Branches 948 941 -7
==========================================
- Hits 3589 3485 -104
- Misses 1780 1790 +10
- Partials 203 204 +1
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
cameo/flux_analysis/simulation.py | 68.18% <ø> (-0.64%) |
:arrow_down: |
...ain_design/deterministic/flux_variability_based.py | 62.74% <37.50%> (-1.58%) |
:arrow_down: |
cameo/models/webmodels.py | 62.87% <0.00%> (-6.07%) |
:arrow_down: |
cameo/core/result.py | 77.77% <0.00%> (-4.05%) |
:arrow_down: |
.../strain_design/deterministic/linear_programming.py | 21.23% <0.00%> (-2.37%) |
:arrow_down: |
...ameo/strain_design/heuristic/evolutionary_based.py | 44.00% <0.00%> (-1.64%) |
:arrow_down: |
...sign/heuristic/evolutionary/objective_functions.py | 70.35% <0.00%> (-1.42%) |
:arrow_down: |
cameo/api/designer.py | 68.61% <0.00%> (-1.27%) |
:arrow_down: |
cameo/core/pathway.py | 22.05% <0.00%> (-1.13%) |
:arrow_down: |
...rain_design/heuristic/evolutionary/optimization.py | 76.71% <0.00%> (-0.98%) |
:arrow_down: |
... and 11 more |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 879e756...459ce3c. Read the comment docs.
@carrascomj can I assist you in getting this merged? I'd like to make a new cobrapy release and this is blocking me. Alternatively, can we pin cobrapy to a specific version in cameo so that it doesn't break?
@Midnighter Yes, please. This and the parent PR (#272, some docs and escher) are both ready to review. It would wait until cobrapy depends on the latest optlang to pin it here.
Moving to latest optlang is exactly why I want to make a new cobrapy release 😆
Related to https://github.com/opencobra/cobrapy/issues/793 Merge this after #272
Description
Previously in cobrapy, setting a lower bound greater than the upper bound (or viceversa) set both bounds to the input value. This was removed in https://github.com/opencobra/cobrapy/pull/1058 and it will raise an error if the bounds are inconsistent.
Implementation
.bounds
was used wherever the intention is to fix the reaction flux to a value.