These are a couple of potential bugs I discovered while reading the VertNet
simplifier source code. I have *not* verified them with real data.
On line 103, I think the relation is backwards (if I understand the
setRelation() method correctly).
On lines 106 and 107, it looks to me like the simplifier is _always_ expressing
the two relationships that should only be expressed if the "in between" classes
are missing. For example, we only express "occurrence related_to taxon" if
there is no identification present.
Original issue reported on code.google.com by stucky.b...@gmail.com on 10 Feb 2014 at 5:33
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
stucky.b...@gmail.com
on 10 Feb 2014 at 5:33