Closed m52go closed 4 years ago
The difference I'm seeing is a reimbursement amount of 34141.70 to refund agent.
[edit] 34141.70 would not be discounted from issuance anyway since it is compensation. Perhaps 34141.70 should have been claimed as compensation and 46142.70 should have been claimed as reimbursement. Then the compensation-bot report would have matched.
Thanks for pointing this out! The compensation-bot is totally correct. Both proposals for the refund agent should have been reimbursement requests, but one was made as a compensation request and one was made as a reimbursement request.
Now that the reimbursement request ceiling is higher, there shouldn't be a need for refund requests to be made as compensation requests.
Standard monthly report.
~I didn't add breakdown of issuance by team because the issuance in the software doesn't match output from jmacxx's script. I will reconcile them, but that will take some time, and I would prefer to get this published quicker.~
(issuance breakdown is now added)