search

bisq-network / growth

Bisq exchange growth experiments
https://bisq.wiki/Growth_team
24 stars 11 forks source link

Opportunity to show Bisq to 30.000++ Bitcoin students on Udemy (300.000 students total) #269

Open hf5pro opened 1 year ago

w0000000t commented 1 year ago

Just food for thought: if Bisq did not decide to pay for this kind of sponsorship, would it mean the lecturer does not intend to talk about Bisq in any case, in a course about bitcoin where it will not only be covered what bitcoin is and how it works, but also how one can acquire it? (with all due implications for blockchain traceability, privacy, chainalysis, and (no)KYC debate) I believe Bisq would deserve a spot in such a course no matter what. Then, obviously, a paid sponsorship would warrant a larger coverage.

pazza83 commented 1 year ago

I agree with @w0000000t

Maybe if the online educator is looking to make profit they should create a how to buy and sell BTC with No KYC. They could show there audience how to do this with Bisq and then charge for the course.

No sponsorship would be required, the online educator can make revenue from the course sales.

hf5pro commented 1 year ago

If there is no sponsorship, bisq would still be mentioned in the course as a great no-ID option. BUT It would be better if the sponsor would be bisq and not a kyc exchange or something - as we all agree bisq needs more users and users need bisq to avoid kyc :)

The sponsorship is additional revenue to make the time worthwhile. No doubt that there is a lot of information about bisq for free on Youtube and other places where sponsorship could also make sense. This proposal is about the value of the marketing return for bisq as the audience of this course has grown over many years and 300.000 people will be reached out to.

If we keep in mind that it takes 10-20 brand touchpoints before a sale happens, there can never be enough marketing done. What needs to be assessed is whether it's a worthy (ROAS) marketing channel with the right audience for bisq.

Just food for thought: if Bisq did not decide to pay for this kind of sponsorship, would it mean the lecturer does not intend to talk about Bisq in any case, in a course about bitcoin where it will not only be covered what bitcoin is and how it works, but also how one can acquire it? (with all due implications for blockchain traceability, privacy, chainalysis, and (no)KYC debate) I believe Bisq would deserve a spot in such a course no matter what. Then, obviously, a paid sponsorship would warrant a larger coverage.