bit-team / backintime

Back In Time - An easy-to-use backup tool for GNU/Linux using rsync in the back
https://backintime.readthedocs.io
GNU General Public License v2.0
2.11k stars 208 forks source link

Status/progress indication for (manual) snapshot deletion #1264

Open jondo opened 2 years ago

jondo commented 2 years ago

Slowly deleting many snapshots should display a progress indicator.

Currently (as of 1.2.1) I can only observe the snapshots slowly disappear in the list. At first I thought that no deleting was going on, until I noticed the disk load.

emtiu commented 2 years ago

I'm merging Issues #237, #707 and #802 into this one. Here's a summary of the information contained there (as well as in #152, which is related but not a duplicate):

This new behavior led to other complaints in #707, #802 and this Issue:

On the prospect of improving the situation and adding better status/progress indicators for snapshot deletion, longtime maintainer @Germar said:

In summary, the current state of affairs is: Snapshot deletion happens detached in the background, and (in the case of manual snapshot deletion) isn't represented in the GUI in any way. The way in which the process of taking a snapshot is displayed in the status bar and system tray is (according to @Germar) not easily extended to deleting a snapshot. In his view, the inter-process communication (IPC) between the background processes, GUI and system tray needs a complete reworking.

aryoda commented 10 months ago

@Douglas1949 I have created a new issue since this issue is reserved for a special topic. Could we please continue our conversation in the new issue #1617?

I have migrated our conversation already...

I have uploaded the two screenshots to my evernote account and given the following email address access to the file - you should have received the invitation by now: @.***

I did not receive an email and I guess you cannot even see my email. Could you please upload for screenshots in the new issue #1617 in a new comment? Or in case of privacy concerns it'd suffice to write the exact wording of the "funny message" into a new comment.