Closed maflcko closed 2 years ago
I sorta agree your point that GDPR expands to every jurisdiction
inevitably. Not an expert in the subject,
but that's what everybody told back in the day.
If everybody universally de facto agrees on that, has agreed on that,
as seen in their actions and cookie policies everywhere, I think it's
others who should prove their point against. I'm willing to read any
legaleze they could want to throw here.
If agreed, then
as simple as replacing embed iframes for hyperlink anchors.
About removing past historic posts, I think that speaks poorly
and contradictorily about a team who takes proud in
not forking hard the chain and taking care
of a network where rewriting old blocks' history is extremely
difficult.
But nobody is gonna know.
For reference embedding a font from a google server might already be a violation: https://rewis.io/urteile/urteil/lhm-20-01-2022-3-o-1749320/
Concept ACK on just nuking all references to Google.
For reference embedding a font from a google server might already be a violation
I don't think we have a need for embedding any special fonts? Or is this a "what if" only?
Might be worth to consider if something needs to be done with youtube iframes. Seee https://github.com/bitcoin-core/bitcoincore.org/pull/848#issuecomment-1014525064 and
git grep '<iframe'
.