arm64 darwin missing from download page

[fanquake]

arm64 darwin binaries are available as part of the 23.0 release, however they are not listed on https://bitcoincore.org/en/download/ at all.

[katesalazar]

Did anyone mention any plan for publishing dual architecture dmg? (I suppose that's a thing...)

On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 3:17 PM Michael Ford @.***> wrote:

arm64 darwin binaries are available as part of the 23.0 release https://bitcoincore.org/bin/bitcoin-core-23.0/, however they are not listed on https://bitcoincore.org/en/download/ at all.

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/bitcoin-core/bitcoincore.org/issues/917, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AMRS4W5CKIGH47U3LMWTSOTWIJCXRANCNFSM6AAAAAAR732JZU . You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: @.***>

[jarolrod]

@katesalazar why provide a fat binary? Lean binary for each architecture is preferable in my opinion.

[katesalazar]

multiarch packages have both advantages and disadvantages, I was really only asking, I've been missing from Bitcoin discussion for the whole version 24 cycle

as for the advantages, I think multiarch binaries fit better the Apple way and the average Apple computer enthusiast mindset

I also think Bitcoin Core can have a sensible divergence from requirements applied commonly to other software.

so I'm not interested in further discussion and very fine with the choices the maintainers team make, particularly hebasto.

On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 3:22 PM Jarol Rodriguez @.***> wrote:

@katesalazar https://github.com/katesalazar why provide a fat binary? Lean binary for each architecture is preferable in my opinion.

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/bitcoin-core/bitcoincore.org/issues/917#issuecomment-1315379999, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AMRS4W5DUPRFGV6O3AIF2YDWIOMEBANCNFSM6AAAAAAR732JZU . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>