Open real-or-random opened 1 month ago
I can at least confirm that this "fixes" the output I was seeing in #1421. The most recent comment on the upstream GCC issue is not 100% clear to me.
The most recent comment on the upstream GCC issue is not 100% clear to me.
Can you elaborate on which part is unclear?
In any case, I could rephrase this such that it says it's a GCC bug. When I wrote it, I wasn't sure yet, but the upstream response seems to confirm that this is a bug.
I've re-read, and yes, it seems like the conclusion is that it is a GCC issue. I guess what is actually unclear is if/when anyone might fix it upstream.
Okay. I've nevertheless rephrased the comment to make it (hopefully) clearer.
Fixes #1421. See code comments for rationale.
Related meta-bug: #1181. This reminds me that we should move forward with #1359.