Open msgilligan opened 3 months ago
It would be nice to have stronger types for these values, rather than using byte[]. Not only will this make a safer API, but will also allow us to add helpful .toString() methods.
byte[]
.toString()
PR #85 takes some steps in his direction, but needs more work.
It would be nice to have stronger types for these values, rather than using
byte[]
. Not only will this make a safer API, but will also allow us to add helpful.toString()
methods.