Closed TuomoKu closed 11 months ago
We prefer to follow the naming scheme of company-product
, which spx
wouldn't conform to.
You are referring to the application as SPX Graphics Controller
at points, so would you be ok with the longer name spx-graphics-controller
?
Hi,
Yes that is absolutely correct. We will start to use that name to distinguish between the app from the overall SPX ecosystem.
So yes, that fits us perfectly.
Thank you!
-Tuomo
pe 24. marrask. 2023 klo 22.47 Julian Waller @.***> kirjoitti:
We prefer to follow the naming scheme of company-product, which spx wouldn't conform to. You are referring to the application as SPX Graphics Controller at points, so would you be ok with the longer name spx-graphics-controller?
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/bitfocus/companion-module-spx-gc/issues/5#issuecomment-1826075210, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AG6SEXPEFFACZLFWKN7JCGLYGEBURAVCNFSM5HA7FNJ2U5DIOJSWCZC7NNSXTN2JONZXKZKDN5WW2ZLOOQ5TCOBSGYYDONJSGEYA . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.***>
Hi, thank you for adding the SPX-GC module to Companion.
The app is right now going through a rename process and "SPX-GC" will in the future be called simply "SPX". Can you please rename the module to reflect this?
Thank you!