Open sskras opened 1 year ago
I expected to recover the bk history from this. Am I doing something wrong or is it a bug?
That is a very old repository. Current versions of bk won't be able to read it. We removed support for short keys in bk-7.2 which was released 10 years ago.
Not sure where to access the current lmbench bk repository.
@wscott, thanks for pointing the specific version. Will try to downgrade.
Not sure where to access the current lmbench bk repository.
I just did git clone https://github.com/ricarkol/lmbench2
. The BitKeeper
dir is inside.
_BK_SHORT_OK=OK bk ....
will let you proceed.
I have an lmbench repo I need to release, made it all 64 bit Ok.
On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 06:07:31AM -0700, Saulius Krasuckas wrote:
@wscott, thanks for pointing the specific version. Will try to downgrade.
Not sure where to access the current lmbench bk repository.
I just did
git clone https://github.com/ricarkol/lmbench2
. TheBitKeeper
dir is inside.-- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/bitkeeper-scm/bitkeeper/issues/5#issuecomment-1280832707 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: @.***>
Larry McVoy Retired to fishing http://www.mcvoy.com/lm/boat
I cloned the Git repo https://github.com/ricarkol/lmbench2. It seems to have some BitKeeper bits:
But when I run
bk log
, it returns me this:Should I use earlier BitKeeper version? Mine is 7.3.2:
I run on Windows, the MSYS2 environment.