This work adds support for RFC5103: Bidirectional Flow Export Using IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX). I needed this support for some work I am doing.
There is an open question on what the reverse fields should be called and if the current approach is the best way to handle it? Should we passing out the the field is a reverse field as opposed to simply adding a "_" onto the name.
The approach is working for me but can make changes as required.
This work adds support for RFC5103: Bidirectional Flow Export Using IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX). I needed this support for some work I am doing.
There is an open question on what the reverse fields should be called and if the current approach is the best way to handle it? Should we passing out the the field is a reverse field as opposed to simply adding a "_" onto the name.
The approach is working for me but can make changes as required.