Closed davgia closed 1 month ago
The issue may not be directly related to the Bitnami container image/Helm chart, but rather to how the application is being utilized, configured in your specific environment, or tied to a specific scenario that is not easy to reproduce on our side.
If you think that's not the case and are interested in contributing a solution, we welcome you to create a pull request. The Bitnami team is excited to review your submission and offer feedback. You can find the contributing guidelines here.
Your contribution will greatly benefit the community. Feel free to reach out if you have any questions or need assistance.
Suppose you have any questions about the application, customizing its content, or technology and infrastructure usage. In that case, we highly recommend that you refer to the forums and user guides provided by the project responsible for the application or technology.
With that said, we'll keep this ticket open until the stale bot automatically closes it, in case someone from the community contributes valuable insights.
Hi @carrodher,
as I said specifying the secrets in the chart values does not result in this error. It must be something related to the chart. I will keep looking.
This Issue has been automatically marked as "stale" because it has not had recent activity (for 15 days). It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thanks for the feedback.
Due to the lack of activity in the last 5 days since it was marked as "stale", we proceed to close this Issue. Do not hesitate to reopen it later if necessary.
Name and Version
bitnami/harbor 23.0.3
What architecture are you using?
amd64
What steps will reproduce the bug?
Are you using any custom parameters or values?
What is the expected behavior?
I should be able to deploy the helm chart successfully without errors.
What do you see instead?
Helm chart installation fails due to timeout reached. The problem is that harbor-core pod goes into CrashLoopBackOff state with the following stdout:
Additional information
I have tried to deploy the chart specifying the following values and it does work as expected:
There must be something I'm missing...