I don't have full confidence that this change is correct because of the complexity here, but it seems to fix the data... Just need careful consideration in review if you could, please, @cded
note: this may have to be reverted after UAT if we've broken other calculations... it seems to be matching expectations though so hopefully we're good to go
fix: (STAF-363) https://bitovi.atlassian.net/browse/STAF-363
I don't have full confidence that this change is correct because of the complexity here, but it seems to fix the data... Just need careful consideration in review if you could, please, @cded
before:
after: