search

bitshares / bsips

BitShares Improvement Proposals and Protocols. These technical documents describe the process of updating and improving the BitShares blockchain and technical ecosystem.
https://bitshares.github.io
63 stars 86 forks source link

Update for [0,100%] to [0,30%] #269

Closed dls-cipher closed 4 years ago

dls-cipher commented 4 years ago

As per discussion in legal and PR terms.

sschiessl-bcp commented 4 years ago

Can you point to the discussion please?

sschiessl-bcp commented 4 years ago

I disagree with this change, as no one has adressed my concern.

abitmore commented 4 years ago

@sschiessl-bcp I as the original author have agreed with the change. @bitcrab as representative of a large part of voters (imo) has agreed with the change. The PR concerns are clear: a platform usually won't charge a 100% fee. Nevertheless I'd like @dls-cipher to give more info about the legal concerns he mentioned too though.

sschiessl-bcp commented 4 years ago

@sschiessl-bcp I as the original author have agreed with the change. @bitcrab as representative of a large part of voters (imo) has agreed with the change. The PR concerns are clear: a platform usually won't charge a 100% fee. Nevertheless I'd like @dls-cipher to give more info about the legal concerns he mentioned too though.

Neither the author or a representative can decide for the voters, simple as that (change happened after being voted in). Especially, since this upper bound has been addressed in review and decided for value 100%. If @bitcrab has enough influence he could provide proof on-chain for that.

Either way, for me this is a principle question, but I guess it's fine since this will likely receive "post-launch-approval" when the change is going live on mainnet simply by the fact that witnesses that support it won't be voted out.

I agree if there are any legal concerns it should be paused.

abitmore commented 4 years ago

@sschiessl-bcp as I understand that you seek for procedural justice or even perfectness, in comparison, I concern more about whether the overall outcome is positive, which is another sort of perfectness. Since many voters aren't voting thoughtfully, in addition they make few efforts on improving the voting process (E.G. little feedback to changes), and education is hard, IMO focusing too much on the process rather than on the result may negatively impact overall progress, which would then negatively impact the value of the platform. It's just my thoughts though.