Closed abitmore closed 4 years ago
Can you please post the en exemplatory block number when they were approved?
I remember that some of them were only above "bsip-threshold" worker, without having this as a written criteria in their definition. As long as no bsip is approved the old-fashioned way to establish bsip-threshold as the new threshhold for BSIPs, every BSIP must have this criteria written in its definition. So considereing them approved is questionable.
I asked several times to redefine it, or do some other action to show voters support for those BSIPs. Is the idea to resort to the ultimate "if witnesses apply the patch and are not voted out, its approved" statement?
When cn-vote removed its vote on refund400k 2 months ago, most of the BSIPs became above it. Now cn-vote is voting for refund400k again, so it looks like none of them is getting support.
At this moment, BSIP 77 has the least votes among the BSIPs I updated. According to the data on chain, BSIP 77 has received 166.66600 BTS in the vesting balance, and its daily pay is 20 BTS. So BSIP 77 has been active for 8+ days.
locked >>> get_object 1.14.246
[{
"id": "1.14.246",
"worker_account": "1.2.121",
"work_begin_date": "2020-01-31T00:00:00",
"work_end_date": "2020-07-20T00:00:00",
"daily_pay": 2000000,
"worker": [
1,{
"balance": "1.13.27174"
}
],
"vote_for": "2:706",
"vote_against": "2:707",
"total_votes_for": "56882586959094",
"total_votes_against": 0,
"name": "Poll - BSIP77 - Add ICR for Debt Positions",
"url": "https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=32047.0"
}
]
locked >>> get_object 1.13.27174
[{
"id": "1.13.27174",
"owner": "1.2.121",
"balance": {
"amount": 16666600,
"asset_id": "1.3.0"
},
"policy": [
1,{
"vesting_seconds": 0,
"start_claim": "1970-01-01T00:00:00",
"coin_seconds_earned": "16583267",
"coin_seconds_earned_last_update": "2020-05-28T11:00:00"
}
],
"balance_type": "worker"
}
]
They had been approved for months, although at this moment their votes are below
refund400k
.