PM-9081: Should cancel the job not the scope when managing autofill requests

[david-livefront]

🎟️ Tracking

PM-9081

📔 Objective

This PR addresses an issue where autofill would not display any options, this occurred because the scope used to process autofill requests would be cancelled and then no no requests could ever be processed.

⏰ Reminders before review

• Contributor guidelines followed
• All formatters and local linters executed and passed
• Written new unit and / or integration tests where applicable
• Used internationalization (i18n) for all UI strings
• CI builds passed
• Communicated to DevOps any deployment requirements
• Updated any necessary documentation or informed the documentation team

🦮 Reviewer guidelines

• 👍 (:+1:) or similar for great changes
• 📝 (:memo:) or ℹ️ (:information_source:) for notes or general info
• ❓ (:question:) for questions
• 🤔 (:thinking:) or 💭 (:thought_balloon:) for more open inquiry that's not quite a confirmed issue and could potentially benefit from discussion
• 🎨 (:art:) for suggestions / improvements
• ❌ (:x:) or ⚠️ (:warning:) for more significant problems or concerns needing attention
• 🌱 (:seedling:) or ♻️ (:recycle:) for future improvements or indications of technical debt
• ⛏ (:pick:) for minor or nitpick changes

[github-actions[bot]]

Checkmarx One – Scan Summary & Details – f8e0e240-1c92-4853-9434-897beffe54d0

No New Or Fixed Issues Found

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Project coverage is 85.66%. Comparing base (d7032b8) to head (558440e).

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #3389 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 85.66% 85.66% ======================================= Files 356 356 Lines 28915 28917 +2 Branches 5010 5010 ======================================= + Hits 24770 24772 +2 Misses 2123 2123 Partials 2022 2022 ```

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[david-livefront]

Thanks @brian-livefront