Open PatrickJRed opened 3 months ago
Hi there,
This has been escalated for further investigation. If you have more information that can help us, please add it below.
Thanks!
Just some thoughts on this
Software, especially Security/Cryption related, should always stay working, so if an Update poses the possibility of breaking functionality, Updates should be user-choice and not developer-enforced.
More general speaking, if I install software where compatibility or stability are major keypoints so i need a specific version, then i should be able to assume I can keep it.
I don't know if I can downgrade the Appimage or if it just re-updates itself - also not gonna test it as I have more important things to do right now other than figuring out bitwarden-nonsense-enforced-auto-update-thingy :)
Just hope that compatibility-breaking wouldn't be an issue the next years.
Thanks for this
might be related https://github.com/bitwarden/clients/issues/8307
I get this error every time i click something ( after another damn auto-update )
recently I saw >>ELECTRON_NO_UPDATER=1<< should deactivate the auto update - does this actually work ?
Steps To Reproduce
1) autostart appimage in desktop (Lubuntu 22.04.) 2) it auto updated itself
Expected Result
i downloaded "Bitwarden-2024.6.4-x86_64.AppImage" it should not auto update or at least ask me if i want to update / give me this option
Actual Result
i downloaded Bitwarden-2024.6.4-x86_64.AppImage but it now says Bitwarden-2024.7.1-x86_64.AppImage
autostart no longer works - the path to the appimage changed cause the name changed so my .desktop files are now no longer working
Screenshots or Videos
No response
Additional Context
This is not (just) a feature request. For me this is a BUG :)
If Server/Webextension can be configured to stay on a specific version - so should the client app
Operating System
Linux
Operating System Version
ubuntu 22.04
Web Browser
Firefox
Browser Version
No response
Build Version
2024.7.1
Issue Tracking Info