Open vovaxnz opened 4 years ago
@moto55
hi, do you know widerface annotations format?
I only know the face box and face landmark.
I don't know the 0 and 0.82
Example:
0--Parade/0_Parade_marchingband_1_849.jpg
449 330 122 149 488.906 373.643 0.0 542.089 376.442 0.0 515.031 412.83 0.0 485.174 425.893 0.0 538.357 431.491 0.0 0.82
@moto55 have you solved your problem? how to train dataset without landmark
@DuckJ I could not find a way to train without landmarks. Just used detector as is, it already works well
if the training label is organized in the above form,loss will not calculate landmark loss, right? You mean that the effect will become worse after finetune, right?
i think the predict bbox is reverse the width and height
@vovaxnz Hello, can I ask you how to use your own data set to generate a data set in a format like widerFace. It is very urgent. It seems that no one maintains this code?
I think we have to know the widerface annotations format Do you know how to read it ? I don't know the 0 and 0.82 Example: 0--Parade/0_Parade_marchingband_1_849.jpg 449 330 122 149 488.906 373.643 0.0 542.089 376.442 0.0 515.031 412.83 0.0 485.174 425.893 0.0 538.357 431.491 0.0 0.82
@alicera 0 is equivalent to comma separated key points, 0.82 is estimated to be less than necessary
What is your label tool?
@alicera labelme
Hi, Thanks a lot for your great work! I ran into a problem when I fine-tune the model on my own dataset with faces marked without landmarks. Can you help me please and show what I'm doing wrong?
I organized annotations in the label.txt file as follows:
in data/config.py i changed batch_size from 24 to 6 and launched training using resnet50 during training the loss decreased, but when I made predictions on previously unseen data using
python test_widerface.py
predicted boxes were worse than with no-finetuned model this is how it looks before fine-tuning: and this is how they looked after fine-tuning: Could you please say what this may be connected with?