Closed BaldrLector closed 5 years ago
Hi, it is assumed that the face contour resampling does not change identity information as it only changes the face contour a bit, so in the code L_id and L_preceptual are computed between the result and ground-truth. It should be similar with training the model by calculating L_id, L_preceptual between result and input appearance.
Hi, it is assumed that the face contour resampling does not change identity information as it only changes the face contour a bit, so in the code L_id and L_preceptual are computed between the result and ground-truth. It should be similar with training the model by calculating L_id, L_preceptual between result and input appearance.
Thank your reply! That makes sense, the ground truth in the code is appearance after face contour resampling by randomly selected pose-guided.
I still have some problems,
Thank you reply, very helpful.
@sanweiliti Hi, here some problems at loss design. the original paper says 'Lreconstruct is the L1 loss between the reenactment result and the input appearance after face contour resampling'. And L_id, L_preceptual ware also computed between result and appearance, but in the code, they ware computed between result and ground-truth(the pose guide)
so is there a mistake? thanks
Hi, did you reproduce the results? I'm just confused by the discrepancy between the terms in the paper and the code implementation.
@sanweiliti Hi, here some problems at loss design. the original paper says 'Lreconstruct is the L1 loss between the reenactment result and the input appearance after face contour resampling'. And L_id, L_preceptual ware also computed between result and appearance, but in the code, they ware computed between result and ground-truth(the pose guide)
so is there a mistake? thanks