Mike Gunter wrote:
"The very nice Buckwalter and Denney dimensional-numbers packages both work
on a fixed set of base dimensions. This is a significant restriction for
me--I want to avoid adding apples to oranges as well as avoiding adding
meters to grams. Is it possible to have an extensible set of base
dimensions? If so, how usable can such a system be made? Is it very much
worse than a system with a fixed set of base dimensions?"
Original issue reported on code.google.com by bjorn.bu...@gmail.com on 29 Jan 2007 at 12:03
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
bjorn.bu...@gmail.com
on 29 Jan 2007 at 12:03