Closed bjornbm closed 6 years ago
I think that defining explicit combination units in NonSI
like milliarcsecond
is probably the best approach, due to the standards issue and the less principled way in which those prefixes are applied?
I think I agree with you. Thanks.
Similar pseudo-metric units exist in other areas of US practice. For example, large wire sizes are specified in "kcmil" or thousands of circular mils, where a circular mil is the area of a circle 0.001" in diameter. Millions of circular mils are also occasionally used. I am about to define these units in a library I use for electrical work, but I would argue that they are more extreme examples of the same thing.
As such I am closing this one as we agree on the answer. I recommend creating a new feature request issue for adding the milliarcsecond
etc units?
Should
degree
,arcminute
,arcsecond
beMetric
? Currently:Wikipedia says:
And millidegrees are also quite common. But perhaps these are not prefixed in a principled way, as the unit names are a bit ad hoc (mdeg, mas, µas)? If they don't qualify as
Metric
, how would you suggest to handle these in practice? Define new units (milliarcsecond
) rather than prefix them?