Closed wbendick closed 9 years ago
I agree with with @wbendick, I had the same issue actually. I was going to commit a fix to the library but got too busy. As a short term workaround I just extended the Feature and added an Id field, really though the feature class should be updated.
Makes sense. Implemented in latest release. Please get back to me if it does not work as expected.
If a feature has a commonly used identifier, that identifier should be included as a member of the feature object with the name "id".
http://geojson.org/geojson-spec.html#feature-objects