search

bkardell / common-panel

An effort to define a new element with clear semantics and separation
14 stars 3 forks source link

Move to WebSpecs #8

Closed darobin closed 9 years ago

darobin commented 9 years ago

If you're up for it, I think it ought to live there. I am soon to support ReSpec too.

bkardell commented 9 years ago

Yep, we'll gladly move it soon. I'd like to have it in a state where we have a few people who agree that this is the proposal we'd like to make - it's generally how I think normal human productivity and communication most naturally works. I expect it's getting pretty close.

LJWatson commented 9 years ago

+1 to moving it to webspecs.org/

+1 to doing a bit more work on it first. If we can tidy up some of the terminology inconsistencies (especially between the spec and the prototypes), and do some reorganisation of the spec so it is broken down by element/attribute (instead of panel variety), it'll help head off a lot of confusion.

LJWatson commented 9 years ago

@darobin if you have guidance on the best way to organise the spec so it starts to feel a little bit more like the real thing, that'd be most useful!

bkardell commented 9 years ago

@darobin are we getting close to where webspecs is ready for us?