Table 7 (page 29): here you do not need to show the sub-categories of fees and allowances anymore, but please also use the numbers from the youth as well for comparison, drop Model 2. Not totally clear to me why you have so few observations for the different models given that the observations for each item seem to be much larger, numbers in Table 7 do not perfectly match numbers in Table 6 – even MC reports, why would did not apply productivity be so much higher? What happens to the calculation if you take the mean wage per sector for productivity (untrained and trained) and not firm specific productivity – as another specification, again allowances for CQP seem to be too high given the sub-categories
Table 7 (page 29): here you do not need to show the sub-categories of fees and allowances anymore, but please also use the numbers from the youth as well for comparison, drop Model 2. Not totally clear to me why you have so few observations for the different models given that the observations for each item seem to be much larger, numbers in Table 7 do not perfectly match numbers in Table 6 – even MC reports, why would did not apply productivity be so much higher? What happens to the calculation if you take the mean wage per sector for productivity (untrained and trained) and not firm specific productivity – as another specification, again allowances for CQP seem to be too high given the sub-categories