Closed evogytis closed 6 years ago
Seems pretty out of the way as a request, especially for the discussion. We have a section in methods justifying the removal of Egyptian sequences, could discuss this there. Strong feelings either way?
This seems like a reasonable thing to address. Agree that it's tricky knowing where to place it in the text. I think the current placement in Methods is as good as we're going to get.
In discussion: Could the author speculate how more sequences from humans and animals, particularly recent ones, or sequences from other geographic areas (east africa, north africa, pakistan) would potentially impace their results?