blackears
commented
7 years ago Hi,
No, I have not performed systematic testing. I have thought about it from time to time, but it would be a lot of effort and I cannot afford the time. I have been updating the source as various people submit bug reports, so the best I can claim is that for the most part people are happy with it.
Mark McKay
SUBJECT: [blackears/svgSalamander] Compliance? (#6) DATE: Fri, 14 Oct 2016 08:06:23 -0700 FROM: hrj TO: blackears/svgSalamander REPLY-TO: blackears/svgSalamander
Hello!
I am very interested in using svgSalamnder for https://github.com/UprootLabs/gngr [1].
Have you performed any tests to see how many features are covered? I did a quick search on the web. In the answers here [2] there are some hints about running the SVG tests from W3C. The reference images were apparently generated by Batik. So it should be possible to write a script that compares the output from SVGSalamaner and Batik and gives a pass/fail report.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub [3], or mute the thread [4].
Links:
[1] https://github.com/UprootLabs/gngr [2] http://stackoverflow.com/questions/33215722/how-to-use-w3c-svg-test-suite/33226912 [3] https://github.com/blackears/svgSalamander/issues/6 [4] https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AGacAIx4ObJim9QNaFioItKDvXCWuElVks5qz5pvgaJpZM4KXHQP
Hello!
I am very interested in using svgSalamnder for https://github.com/UprootLabs/gngr.
Have you performed any tests to see how many features are covered? I did a quick search on the web. In the answers here there are some hints about running the SVG tests from W3C. The reference images were apparently generated by Batik. So it should be possible to write a script that compares the output from SVGSalamaner and Batik and gives a pass/fail report.