Open zaxtax opened 6 months ago
Attention: Patch coverage is 91.30435%
with 2 lines
in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.
Project coverage is 98.80%. Comparing base (
7cf4f9d
) to head (b2d2273
). Report is 1 commits behind head on main.:exclamation: Current head b2d2273 differs from pull request most recent head bf703cd. Consider uploading reports for the commit bf703cd to get more accurate results
Files | Patch % | Lines |
---|---|---|
blackjax/progress_bar.py | 91.30% | 2 Missing :warning: |
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
@zaxtax should we update this after https://github.com/blackjax-devs/blackjax/pull/712 and get it merge?
Do we still want to migrate to tqdm?
On Fri, 27 Sept 2024, 09:55 Junpeng Lao, @.***> wrote:
@zaxtax https://github.com/zaxtax should we update this after #712 https://github.com/blackjax-devs/blackjax/pull/712 and get it merge?
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/blackjax-devs/blackjax/pull/655#issuecomment-2378644298, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAACCUOYVZRJOXX7BDEYNFDZYUFNPAVCNFSM6AAAAABO6TKKOCVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDGNZYGY2DIMRZHA . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>
I forgot the reason why we were doing this beside the pmap bug (which is now fixed)
Moves to use tqdm along with adding support for multiple progress bars
Makes blackjax suitable for running multiple chains in parallel.