Closed LuaBgd closed 4 years ago
@LuaBgd Are you certain there are no conflicting constraints? Even just 1 will make make an analysis impossible. For example, if there are any topological differences between your tree and the tree you referenced, then some constraints can be redundant or conflicting. I have (R) code that can check constraint consistency. If you post your tree & config file I can test things for you. If it proves useful I can clean it up a bit and put it in the treePL repo.
Hi !
Thank you very much for your answer! I am definitely not certain there are no conflicting constraints but I extracted them as follow:
So, I thought everything should be already consistent... But yes I can post the tree and the constraints, that would be lovely of you to look at it!
Thank you very much, Luana
Hi everyone,
would it possible to share that R code to check constraint consistency? I have a similar issue and a lot of large trees to date where manually checking would take forever.... Thanks a lot!
Best wishes, Belinda
Hi everyone,
I am also using treePL with constraints and I got the error message: "Failed setting feasible start rates/dates after 10 attempts. Aborting." I obtained ages for the nodes to constrain from a tree, previsouly dated using treePL so they shouldn't be conflicting constraints as you present them : one node close to the tips older than one closer to the root. Is there other cases where constraints can be conflicting that I could check for ? I am dating a tree with 2340 species and using around 200 constraints, is it too much ? how can I choose the best ones ?
Thank you very much for your answers !
Have a nice day !
Luana phD student Toulouse, FRANCE