Closed muzimuzhi closed 6 months ago
This is fixed in the next version (hopefully sent today to CTAN and to here) by switching from x-type to e-type expansion everywhere in unravel
, which means that the package does not affect \l__exp_internal_tl
at all.
Thanks! I confirm it's resolved with gtl
v0.6 (2024-01-04), containing https://github.com/blefloch/latex-gtl/commit/749a635296313ac17fcb23f7bdae99f696b7f546.
Update: Similar x- to e-type changes in unravel
happened in https://github.com/blefloch/latex-unravel/commit/26d4f63c98b4ca90d8f32e2c902cc421084b8b51 and https://github.com/blefloch/latex-unravel/commit/67d6c5aaa675997346157d201f3e0377a6728bbd.
The problem starts at Step 4. The expected value of
\l__exp_internal_tl
isxxx
, but an internal definition was used instead.