Perform a cost-benefit analysis for different RunPod subscription models.

[TimPietrusky]

User Story

Title: Cost-Benefit Analysis for RunPod Subscription Models
As a product owner
I want to perform a cost-benefit analysis for different RunPod subscription models
So that we can choose the most efficient and cost-effective subscription model

Acceptance Criteria

• [x] Identify and list all available RunPod subscription models.
• [x] Analyze the cost implications of each subscription model.
• [x] Evaluate the benefits, including but not limited to, computing power, availability, and support provided by each model.
• [x] Create a comprehensive comparison chart or matrix that includes cost, benefits, and potential limitations for each model.
• [x] Recommend the most suitable subscription model based on the analysis.

Potential Subtasks

• [x] Conduct a market comparison to evaluate RunPod's subscription models against competitors, focusing on unique features and value propositions.
• [x] Assess potential risks and mitigation strategies associated with each RunPod subscription model, including service downtimes and support issues.

[TimPietrusky]

• Pods vs serverless pricing: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1If-sBlaYBnaG0MdaRDJIX9GPTChVKNC9_yThG0JeMyU/edit?usp=sharing
• It makes the most sense to use the pods, as they are way cheaper on the long run
• Compared this with replicate = RunPod is still more affordable
• Compared this with lambdalabs = RunPod is still more afforable and also does provide GPUs like 3090 or 4090 that lambdalabs doesn't offer