README instructions do not match sample

[inhaledesign]

In the README, there's directoins to use @ClassRule:

@ClassRule
public static DisableAnimationsRule animationsRule = new DisableAnimationsRule();

But in the code sample, the code uses an instance level @Rule https://github.com/blipinsk/disable-animations-rule/blob/f3bd9c934d4b139200ee97e1b2c108a2d122d7ff/sample/src/androidTest/java/com/bartoszlipinski/disableanimationsrule/sample/activity/MainActivityTest.java#L18-L25

This is maybe a minor point, but noticing the discrepancy I am left wondering if there is a reason to prefer one over the other?

[blipinsk]

@ClassRule should be used in most cases as it would make your tests better in terms of performance. You could see the difference if you had multiple @Test functions in your class.

E.g. it would work as following

Using @ClassRule (executed once for the class)

1. Disabling animations
2. executing @Test # 1
3. executing @Test # 2
4. executing @Test # 3
5. Enabling animations

Using @Rule (executed once for every test)

1. Disabling animations
2. executing @Test # 1
3. Enabling animations
4. Disabling animations
5. executing @Test # 2
6. Enabling animations
7. Disabling animations
8. Executing @Test # 3
9. Enabling animations

---

I used @Rule in the sample because... ¯_(ツ)_/¯ I might change it at some point if you found it confusing.

[blipinsk]

@inhaledesign did you find my explanation informative enough?

[inhaledesign]

Hey, sorry for not replying. Yeah, the explanation was very clear, thank you.

[blipinsk]

No worries, cheers.