search

blockchain-working-group / agendas

Agendas for weekly blockchain working group meetings
https://www.actiac.org
2 stars 2 forks source link

Look into NIST 800-53 controls, as it relates to any public blockchain #7

Open ryanwoldatwork opened 1 year ago

ryanwoldatwork commented 1 year ago
TheConnectR commented 7 months ago

standards matter to government agencies. The agency heads must demonstrate compliance therefore a NIST standard 800-53 or other matters. 800-53 is more about products than architectures.

ryanwoldatwork commented 7 months ago

@TheConnectR - these controls came to mind:

fdevaulx commented 6 months ago

A while back, as part of VTF, we had done a small study on DLT Federal Adoption that could be of interest. It is probably outdated now.

https://www.valuetechnology.org/file-share/5f913db9-3182-4aaf-b64c-82edf6098330

fdevaulx commented 6 months ago

Can a DLT solution be put in place accros agencies to address some of the ATO system login requirements.

afomi commented 2 months ago

@fdevaulx - I'll try to get something back to this group in 2 fridays from now

afomi commented 1 month ago

https://gist.github.com/afomi/f616597f098cf5abcdddde5d97e25cfc

afomi commented 1 month ago

@fdevaulx - any ideas on if/where to put this? ^

Otherwise, I'll close this out after next Friday's call, 10/18.

fdevaulx commented 1 month ago

Do you mean where to put the page you made? We could fold it into one of the other ATO issue we have?

afomi commented 1 month ago

ya I created this task to try to connect the technical and policy implications of blockchain.

I could have done better defining Acceptance Criteria for this task.

Given the gist/doc, does it make sense to post it in the repo, or spawn another task to incorporate this into a doc or maturity model?

TheConnectR commented 1 month ago

Perhaps make it a task we tackle during a future call.

Thank you,

Sandy Barsky | Executive Program Director Mobile: +1 202-487-0337 email: @.**@.> Oracle North America Government and Education 1910 Oracle Way | Reston, VA 20190

On Oct 11, 2024, at 11:48 AM, Ryan Wold @.***> wrote:



ya I created this task to try to connect the technical and policy implications of blockchain.

I could have done better defining Acceptance Criteria for this task.

Given the gist/doc, does it make sense to post it in the repo, or spawn another task to incorporate this into a doc or maturity model?

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/blockchain-working-group/agendas/issues/7*issuecomment-2407685800__;Iw!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!LJkAB_EngZS03aSEq-Y-tbDGITLDV9NqWL4-mY9-sqsvZB2joR1bti98X-U43KZ4i8iB1OQt_bffSsUa21qcEqNu6C4$, or unsubscribehttps://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/BIDKQLYWHIN6TBCUICOZQMLZ27XMFAVCNFSM6AAAAAA5DHMEOKVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDIMBXGY4DKOBQGA__;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!LJkAB_EngZS03aSEq-Y-tbDGITLDV9NqWL4-mY9-sqsvZB2joR1bti98X-U43KZ4i8iB1OQt_bffSsUa21qc8DtN328$. You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

fdevaulx commented 1 month ago

@afomi work with Earl on using zero trust models for blockchain ATOs