We need to track and manage grant reviews within the Karma project through the Ethereum Attestation Service (EAS). To achieve this, we aim to draft an architecture schema that clearly illustrates the flow of grant reviews, ensuring transparency, security, and efficiency in the review process.
Objective
Develop a comprehensive architecture schema that outlines the workflow of grant reviews within the Karma project. This schema should detail how reviews are submitted, validated, and stored, emphasizing the integration with EAS attestations to guarantee accurate tracking and verification of each grant's lifecycle.
Questions for Consideration:
How can we ensure precise tracking of grants using EAS attestations?
What properties within the EAS schema are essential for maintaining accurate records of these grants?
Task Details
Draft an Architecture Schema: Create a visual representation of the grant review process, highlighting how reviews are initiated, submitted, verified, and stored. This schema should integrate seamlessly with the existing Karma project infrastructure and leverage EAS for authentication and validation purposes.
Accuracy Assurance: Identify mechanisms to guarantee the precision of grant tracking via EAS attestations.
Schema Properties: Determine key properties within the EAS schema that facilitate meticulous grant tracking.
Checklist for Solution Development
[x] Research EAS Capabilities: Gain a deep understanding of Ethereum Attestation Service functionalities, focusing on features relevant to this context.
[x] Identify Key Components: List all components involved in the grant review lifecycle, including submission, validation, and storage mechanisms.
[x] Propose Integrations: Suggest solutions/features to the Karma team that could enhance the review process.
[x] Security Measures: Outline strategies to authenticate reviewers and validate submissions exclusively to grant owners.
[x] Review Process Mapping: Map out the journey of a review from submission to final storage, detailing each step and verification checkpoints.
[x] Property Identification: Pinpoint essential properties in the EAS schema crucial for grant tracking.
[x] Look on others blockchains: Look in other grants what data they use in in their grant that we could use for this context.
[x] Feedback Mechanism: Discuss ideas to have a fast return and feedback to check if it's the right way.
[x] Prototype Design: Sketch a preliminary design of the proposed architecture, focusing on simplicity and scalability.
[x] Documentation: Prepare documentation explaining the schema's functionality and integration points with Karma project components.
Description
We need to track and manage grant reviews within the Karma project through the Ethereum Attestation Service (EAS). To achieve this, we aim to draft an architecture schema that clearly illustrates the flow of grant reviews, ensuring transparency, security, and efficiency in the review process.
Objective
Develop a comprehensive architecture schema that outlines the workflow of grant reviews within the Karma project. This schema should detail how reviews are submitted, validated, and stored, emphasizing the integration with EAS attestations to guarantee accurate tracking and verification of each grant's lifecycle.
Questions for Consideration:
Task Details
Checklist for Solution Development