Closed iam-py-test closed 3 years ago
Just by doing a curl request to www.reachporn.com
and looking at the HTML content it looks like this website does not contain any explicit content and is simply a directory to other explicit websites. I think this project should be hesitant about including websites that don't contain the content we are blocking themselves.
I could be missing something here, so someone might want to do a more in depth look to ensure I'm not missing something. Maybe some JavaScript is adding content in after the fact?
@fishcharlie I was just looking at the AV rating for these domains and McAfee & FortiGuard rate it as Pornography It is likely those are FPs. If you have a better detection method (apart from visiting these websites) I am open to options
@fishcharlie I am checking it out in a VM. Please wait
@iam-py-test Yeah. I try to look at the HTML content behind it as well to get a better sense of what is going on (and in this case use curl to get a response without loading it in the browser). It's up to @blocklistproject about the policies here. It's obviously a lot easier to load ads domains in your browser and such to confirm.
Especially with this category, I tend to use Safari with the developer tools enabled to Disable Images
. That is a really helpful tool in this case.
@iam-py-test Yeah. I try to look at the HTML content behind it as well to get a better sense of what is going on (and in this case use curl to get a response without loading it in the browser). It's up to @blocklistproject about the policies here. It's obviously a lot easier to load ads domains in your browser and such to confirm.
Especially with this category, I tend to use Safari with the developer tools enabled to
Disable Images
. That is a really helpful tool in this case.
I don't have safari (my VM is Linux) so I can't do that.
However, uBlock Origin with *$image
works for me.
One problem; without images, you can't tell if it is porn or not
I have confirmed there is porn content.
Example URL: https://www.reachporn.com/free-porn-tubes/3movs/
As HOSTS format does not allow URL-level blocking, and as there are many urls like this, I think blocking the domain is needed.
Also, why would someone what to block porn but not a site which is only used for finding more porn
@iam-py-test Very true. Allows you get an initial sense of the content tho. Sometimes Disable Images
gives you enough information to know it should be added to the list.
@iam-py-test Yep, I'm fine with that. Thanks for double checking. I can create a PR for this.
@fishcharlie I can open a PR
@iam-py-test Already done: #390
URLs you wish to be added:
Why you believe this should be added: These are porn Add to list: Porn Other info you think we should know: These domains should be able to be copypasted directly into the list