blocklistproject / Lists

Primary Block Lists
The Unlicense
3.78k stars 344 forks source link

[Add request] Porn domains #388

Closed iam-py-test closed 3 years ago

iam-py-test commented 3 years ago

URLs you wish to be added:

0.0.0.0 hegreartnudes.com
0.0.0.0 www.hegreartnudes.com
0.0.0.0 fancelebs.com
0.0.0.0 www.reachporn.com
0.0.0.0 reachporn.com
0.0.0.0 babesdiscounts.com
0.0.0.0 www.babesdiscounts.com
0.0.0.0 eroticbeauties.com
0.0.0.0 www.eroticbeauties.com
0.0.0.0 mail.eroticbeauties.com
0.0.0.0 4fuq.com

Why you believe this should be added: These are porn Add to list: Porn Other info you think we should know: These domains should be able to be copypasted directly into the list

fishcharlie commented 3 years ago

Just by doing a curl request to www.reachporn.com and looking at the HTML content it looks like this website does not contain any explicit content and is simply a directory to other explicit websites. I think this project should be hesitant about including websites that don't contain the content we are blocking themselves.

I could be missing something here, so someone might want to do a more in depth look to ensure I'm not missing something. Maybe some JavaScript is adding content in after the fact?

iam-py-test commented 3 years ago

@fishcharlie I was just looking at the AV rating for these domains and McAfee & FortiGuard rate it as Pornography It is likely those are FPs. If you have a better detection method (apart from visiting these websites) I am open to options

iam-py-test commented 3 years ago

@fishcharlie I am checking it out in a VM. Please wait

fishcharlie commented 3 years ago

@iam-py-test Yeah. I try to look at the HTML content behind it as well to get a better sense of what is going on (and in this case use curl to get a response without loading it in the browser). It's up to @blocklistproject about the policies here. It's obviously a lot easier to load ads domains in your browser and such to confirm.

Especially with this category, I tend to use Safari with the developer tools enabled to Disable Images. That is a really helpful tool in this case.

iam-py-test commented 3 years ago

@iam-py-test Yeah. I try to look at the HTML content behind it as well to get a better sense of what is going on (and in this case use curl to get a response without loading it in the browser). It's up to @blocklistproject about the policies here. It's obviously a lot easier to load ads domains in your browser and such to confirm.

Especially with this category, I tend to use Safari with the developer tools enabled to Disable Images. That is a really helpful tool in this case.

I don't have safari (my VM is Linux) so I can't do that. However, uBlock Origin with *$image works for me. One problem; without images, you can't tell if it is porn or not

iam-py-test commented 3 years ago

I have confirmed there is porn content. Example URL: https://www.reachporn.com/free-porn-tubes/3movs/ As HOSTS format does not allow URL-level blocking, and as there are many urls like this, I think blocking the domain is needed. Also, why would someone what to block porn but not a site which is only used for finding more porn

fishcharlie commented 3 years ago

@iam-py-test Very true. Allows you get an initial sense of the content tho. Sometimes Disable Images gives you enough information to know it should be added to the list.

fishcharlie commented 3 years ago

@iam-py-test Yep, I'm fine with that. Thanks for double checking. I can create a PR for this.

iam-py-test commented 3 years ago

@fishcharlie I can open a PR

fishcharlie commented 3 years ago

@iam-py-test Already done: #390