Closed KrissDrawing closed 1 month ago
Name | Link |
---|---|
Latest commit | 5243e075e0a9505772330b8a18008866e9f31d22 |
Latest deploy log | https://app.netlify.com/sites/partners-bloom-dev/deploys/66b109624551310008aa0969 |
Deploy Preview | https://deploy-preview-4169--partners-bloom-dev.netlify.app |
Preview on mobile | Toggle QR Code...Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link. |
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.
Name | Link |
---|---|
Latest commit | 5243e075e0a9505772330b8a18008866e9f31d22 |
Latest deploy log | https://app.netlify.com/sites/bloom-exygy-dev/deploys/66b10962c3d99800086b8fc1 |
Deploy Preview | https://deploy-preview-4169--bloom-exygy-dev.netlify.app |
Preview on mobile | Toggle QR Code...Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link. |
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.
I think this needs more discussion with product. Units can be added without AMIs and hiding the table but not changing how the Household Maximum Income section and Listings page/search to Listing flow confusing. Cases to note with the change this PR makes:
This creates a confusing user experience where the user may not understand what units are available, what the rent is for those units and if they are eligible. @sarahlazarich
Good points @mcgarrye - let me confirm with Izzie if we should just block this entirely. I'll follow up.
Looks like partners cypress tests are failing. Do you mind checking this out @KrissDrawing?
This PR addresses #692
Description
It's a change from task comment. It will throw an error when trying to add unit without ami chart
How Can This Be Tested/Reviewed?
Create new unit without touching
AMI Chart
dropdown. Try to save -> It should throw validation error (prevent from saving)Author Checklist:
yarn generate:client
and/or created a migration when requiredReview Process: