Closed nsmith0 closed 3 years ago
Bar::Zab::Foo
is an ElaboratedTypeLoc
, you can get from it to the bare TypeLoc
Foo
using getNamedTypeLoc()
. Both of them will resolve to the same declaration in most cases, so deduplicating them using their position like you are doing is generally okay.
However, there is one case where they will not overlap: if Foo
is declared via the using
keyword, the declaration of bare TypeLoc
will point to the wrong place, in particular it will point to the original definition of the class referenced in the using
statement.
As an example:
// A.h
namespace A {
class X {};
}
// B.h
namespace B {
using Y = A::X;
}
// test.cpp
B::Y var
In this case, the declaration of B::Y
will point to A::X
in A.h
, which is wrong. The solution is to resolve the "qualifier" of the ElaboratedTypeLoc
, aka B
, into a namespace and then look up the bare TypeLoc
, aka Y
, in the namespace. This will give you the using
statement that you can then add a reference to.
is this worth doing here?
Issue number of the reported bug or feature request: #
None
Describe your changes
clang's AST matchers are matching twice on a fully qualified type reference like:
Bar::Zab::Foo
.Once for:
Bar::Zab::Foo
And once for:Foo
So for respective file UIDs,
IncludeGraphData's
usage_reference_count
is set to 2 for a line like this:Bar::Zab::Foo foo;
when it should only be set to 1.My fix involves tracking the end locations of
RecordType
s. The postulate is that twoRecordType
s that end at the same location are in fact the sameRecordType
. If we find two or moreRecordType
s with the same end location, count them as 1. Can anyone think of an example that invalidates this assumption, and is there a more clangy way of fixing this, perhaps with matchers?Testing performed
Added two new unit tests, 038 and 039, which test correct fully qualified reference counts.